New London Police Chief Brian Wright Selects Only Low IQ Police Applicants - But Why?

New London Police Chief Brian M. Wright Speaks Candadly w/ self  & Shoulder Rabbit


Introduction: 

Recruiting police officers has become a challenging task for many police departments in the United States. Despite the public's efforts to improve recruitment which are being mentioned under New London Police Chief Brian Wright's leadership, some departments are still facing difficulties in filling vacant positions. In 2000, the case of Jordan v. City of New London in Connecticut drew attention to the issue of recruitment and the role of intelligence in policing. This case has the potential to impact police recruitment and selection processes in significant ways. This article explores the details of this case, police chief Brian Wright and the implications for police recruitment and intelligence standards.


Importance of Intelligence in Policing:


Research has shown that intelligence is an essential component in policing. Police officers require cognitive skills, such as problem-solving and decision-making, to perform their duties effectively. However, there is a lack of consensus on the level of intelligence required to be a police officer.

Equal Protection of the Laws:


The Constitution provides for equal protection of the laws, which means that all citizens should be treated equally regardless of their race, gender, or any other factor. Denying employment to a police applicant based on their high intelligence raises questions about the equal protection of the laws.


The Case of Jordan v. City of New London (2000):


The case of Jordan v. City of New London (police) involved a police applicant who was denied employment because he scored too high on the cognitive ability portion of his written application test. The plaintiff denied a police job for his IQ argued that the test had a disparate impact on applicants with high intelligence, and the city's decision to deny him employment violated his constitutional rights.


Findings of a Survey on the Role of Intelligence in Policing:


A survey conducted by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) found that most police departments did not have a formal policy on the role of intelligence in recruitment and selection. This is true in the case of Chief Brian Wright. However, many departments recognized the importance of intelligence and included it as a factor in their selection processes. Chief Wright defends the practice of hiring low IQ police force applicants allegedly comparing high IQ recruits to, "shoulder rabbits who latch on," and then let go by quitting after expensive training.


Practical and Legal Implications:


The case of Jordan v. City of New London has practical and legal implications for police departments. Police departments need to ensure that their recruitment and selection processes do not violate the constitutional rights of applicants. They also need to consider the role of intelligence in their selection processes and ensure that their standards are not discriminatory.


Conclusion:


The case of Jordan v. City of New London has significant implications for police recruitment and intelligence standards. Police departments need to recognize the importance of IQ in policing and ensure that their selection processes do not violate the constitutional rights of applicants. The case also highlights the need for police departments like the New London Police Department to have formal policies on the role of intelligence in their recruitment and selection processes. By doing so, police departments such as that under Chief Brian M. Wright's command can ensure that they are attracting the best and brightest candidates to serve and protect their communities.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When CT's GA10 Attorney, Ryan Ziolkowski Esq. Takes The Cake

Image
In New London's GA10 Court, a corrupt outpost of white Italian family members with great hair run a select group of businesses spanning the normal bail bond to corrections-related business ventures collectively forming New London’s local justice system here out on the Eastern Coastline of scenic New England. Here, there's a husky brute of a figure called CT Attorney Ryan Ziolkowski Esw. Attorney at mother fuc**n law. If you're unlucky enough to be poor and charged with a crime by the New London Police, you'll run the risk of being assigned an attorney like Ryan Ziolkowski. And that's where your troubles start: Backed up into a corner with Ryan looming over you, you're told exactly what prosecutor David Smith wants -and it's phrased as an escalating threat which spans from his talking louder, than talking over you, concluding with threats of jail. I tried to get him to get me the police reports since the charges I was hit with were ridiculously false. ...
Read more

NEW LONDON’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ALLEGES CITY VIOLATES FOIA, ERASES WHISTLEBLOWER WEBSITES, IGNORES REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

New London’s Oversight Committee Alleges City Violates FOIA, Erases Whistleblower Websites, Ignores Requests for Public Records Jonathan Brand April 5, 2023 Originally published at: https://newlondonvoice.com/new-londons-public-oversight-committee-accuses-government-of-violating-foia-law/ is that site still there? If this comes up in search the City of New London Has Likely Hacked our resident-built site a third time. 10:49 pm 1 a glaring neon sign obscuring the facade of NL's local City Hall, "Keep Out!" Yet residents beg to differ, we won't be silenced by city hackers again, we will not be erased. Thanks to site security updates, "We the residents of New London are back online and will not be hacked or silenced again. Mayor M. Passero of New London CT April 5th, 2023, NEW LONDON: 27 members of New London’s Public Oversight Committee alleged that the city government had violated the state’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by refusing to respond to their p...
Read more